The question of whether sugar is an "addictive substance" seems simple on the surface, but in reality it lies in a complex gray area between neuroscience, human behavior, and the modern food industry. Scientifically, we know that eating high-sugar foods activates the brain's reward circuits, the same neural circuits that regulate motivation, reinforcement-based learning, and pleasure. When sugar is consumed, dopamine signals in the reward system spike, making the experience biologically "rewarding" and promoting repetition of the behavior via neural learning mechanisms. The brain learns that this food equals a quick reward, increasing the anticipation, desire and impulse to repeat it, especially when it is readily available. This is why researchers describe the effect of sugar as "positive reinforcement" that increases attachment to food behavior, especially when sugar is paired with highly processed products that are easy to eat and quickly absorbed (Rogers et al., 2024).
But is the presence of a dopaminergic reward enough to categorize sugar as an "addiction" in the clinical sense? This is where the scientific controversy begins. Many specialists distinguish between "addiction-like characteristics" and "substance use disorder" as defined in official diagnostic manuals. In a scientific debate published by Harvard Gazette, experts concluded that sugar may exhibit some addiction-like characteristics, such as cravings and difficulty in control in some individuals, but it is not officially classified as an addictive substance like alcohol or nicotine. The analysis also noted that the issue is often not with sugar alone, but with "ultra-processed foods" that combine sugar with fat, salt, stimulating textures, and intense marketing, increasing the susceptibility to compulsive consumption and complicating the separation of substance and context (Harvard Gazette, 2025).
From a behavioral perspective, the similarity to addictive patterns emerges in three central points: first, "repeated reinforcement" (every time sugar = reward), second, "gradualism" or tolerance-like (needing larger amounts or more repetition to get the same satisfaction in some people), and third, "loss of control" (eating despite not being hungry or despite the intention to stop). A scientific review of the "state of the science" on sugar addiction found that the strongest evidence often comes from animal experiments or "intermittent sugar" models that showed withdrawal-like behavior and increased motivation to obtain sugar, while translating this to humans is more complicated due to different food environments and psychosocial factors (Westwater et al., 2016). This makes it clear that the debate is not about whether or not there is a neurological effect, but rather the degree of similarity to a full-blown clinical addiction.
The effect of sugar on mood and energy swings is often associated with a clear physiological mechanism but with a cumulative effect. Sugar-added foods, especially when they are poor in fiber and protein, may raise blood glucose quickly, followed by relatively high insulin secretion, which can create a "wobble" in energy and attention levels. The individual feels momentarily energized and then tired, irritable, or craving another sugar rush. This pattern doesn't necessarily occur in everyone, but it explains the "high and low" experience that many describe. From a public health perspective, the World Health Organization recommends limiting "free sugars" to less than 10% of total daily energy, with less than 5% preferred for additional benefits, reflecting an institutionalized recognition of the impact of excess sugar on physical and possibly psychological health (World Health Organization, 2015).
Moving on to the relationship between sugar and anxiety and mood disorders, the picture becomes more complex. The evidence is not all in one direction, and results vary depending on the type of study and its methodology. However, a recent meta-analysis involving 40 studies and more than 1.2 million participants showed that sugar intake was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of depression, while the association with anxiety was weaker or inconclusive in the overall result (Zhang et al., 2024). It is important to emphasize that correlation does not imply direct causation, but it does suggest that sugar may be part of a broader dietary-lifestyle pattern associated with mood disorders.
Perhaps one of the most notable shifts in the contemporary scientific debate is the focus on "ultra-processed foods" as a whole food environment that increases susceptibility to compulsive consumption and affects both physical and mental health. A comprehensive review published in BMJ in 2024 found an association between higher exposure to ultra-processed foods and multiple health risks, including common mental disorders, placing sugar within a broader network of structural factors (Lane et al., 2024).
The bottom line is that sugar activates the reward center and enhances desire via dopamine, and can create an addictive behavioral pattern in some individuals, but it is not a medically-approved "addictive substance" like drugs. Its real power is when it works in a modern food environment: Ultra-processed products, easy access, and constant marketing. This is where the mind-body connection becomes clear: What we eat doesn't just affect glucose levels, it reshapes patterns of desire, mood and attention. If symptoms of anxiety, mood swings, or distraction are noticeable, they should be dealt with within a holistic framework that includes sleep, movement, nutrition, and psychological support when needed, rather than reducing the issue to an individual struggle with a single "substance."
Comments