Introduction
Singapore today is one of the most intriguing educational models globally; it is a small country with few natural resources, yet it consistently tops international assessment tests and is associated with the reputation of an "educational miracle." Data indicates that about 41% of Singapore's students rank among the highest performers in mathematics, while about 23-24% achieve advanced levels in science and reading, with a significant proportion of students excelling in all three areas (OECD, 2023; IB Consulting, 2025).These quantitative indicators take on added significance when placed in a general context that has seen an "unprecedented decline" in the results of many education systems after the COVID-19 pandemic, while Singapore has maintained and even strengthened its leading position in some respects.
But the essence of the "miracle" lies not in the numbers alone, but in the way Singapore has redefined the relationship between rigor and pressure in schools.For decades, its education system was associated with a culture of high-stakes exams and a frantic social race for grades, but since the late 2000s we have seen a reform trajectory that simultaneously aims to maintain high academic standards, reduce unhelpful stress, and move from "mindless memorization" to "rigorous and deep learning."
Structural Transformations in the Education System - From Academic Discipline to Real Competence
Singapore's education system emerged in the context of a state that views human capital as the primary strategic resource, and was therefore built from the outset on strict academic discipline, rigorous national examinations, and detailed educational pathways that linked student performance to their future position in the labor market.The Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) and the "Streaming" system at the secondary level were key tools for categorizing students into "academic," "regular," or "technical" tracks, with a strong culture of ranking and comparison between schools and grades (National Center on Education and the Economy [NCEE], 2022).This model has produced a generation of students who excel in international exams, but at the same time it has instilled high levels of stress and anxiety in students and their families, especially in the early stages.
Beginning around 2018, Singapore's Ministry of Education (MOE) announced a strategic shift, called Learn for Life, to move from a narrow focus on exam results to a broader vision of education as a continuous process of building a person, while maintaining academic rigor.This shift was manifested in a package of structural policies, most notably the elimination of weighted exams and tests in the first and second primary grades entirely, and the reduction of semi-annual exams in other grades, so that performance on one specific day is no longer the sole determinant of a student's path. The display of detailed grades and exact numbers on certificates in lower grades was also minimized to reduce the culture of early comparison among children (World Economic Forum, 2018; The Logical Indian, 2018; My Modern Met, 2019).
A pivotal part of these structural shifts is the move from a single, decisive exam to "continuous assessment." A student's evaluation is based on the accumulation of their performance in class, projects, assignments, quizzes, and collaborative activity, rather than an excessive focus on a single final exam.This philosophy does not abolish the exam, but repositions it in a broader context of tools that measure "true competence" and the student's ability to apply knowledge in renewed situations, which is reflected in the nature of the PISA questions themselves, which assess real-world problem solving rather than mere information retrieval (OECD, 2023; Schleicher, 2023).
Singapore, on the other hand, has restructured one of the most controversial elements of its system: the pathways system at the secondary level.As of 2024, so-called Full Subject-Based Banding was introduced in about 120 secondary schools, ending the traditional division of students into "fast," "normal," and "technical" tracks and replacing it with a grading system that allows students to study different subjects at different levels according to their actual abilities in each subject, with the ability to move between levels as their performance improves.This new arrangement reduces the social stigmatization that accompanied the lower tracks, while maintaining the idea of "academic excellence" and the system's need to vary the speed and depth of learning.
In addition, Singapore has worked to design curricula that minimize filler and maintain scientific discipline by focusing on "big concepts" in math, science, and languages, and arranging content in a way that allows for the gradual building of higher cognitive skills, such as analysis, application, and evaluation, rather than the accumulation of small, isolated units.This systematic simplification does not mean lowering the level of difficulty, but rather redistributing it across stages of learning so that school time is invested in building "rigorous and deep learning", which explains the ability to combine high performance rates in PISA with announced efforts to reduce exam pressure (OECD, 2023; NCEE, 2022).
Theme 2: Curriculum reform and raising the status of the teacher - How to build a school that produces innovators?
At the curricular level, Singapore has gradually moved from a model that focuses on exam preparation to one that emphasizes "comprehensive learning outcomes" that include, in addition to academic knowledge, critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, creativity, and resilience to change, with a clear focus on STEM and digital skills for the economy of the future.In this context, "project-based learning" has become a major part of classroom practices, where students are asked to work in groups on projects that span time periods, address real-life issues in the school, community, or local environment, and require the use of more than one subject simultaneously.This type of learning pushes students to practice research, analysis, decision-making, negotiation with colleagues, and trial and error, rather than simply memorizing ready-made models of questions. Supported by "continuous assessment" policies, the project itself becomes an assessment tool that reflects the student's real progress and reveals their ability to apply what they have learned in new contexts (Assessment for Learning literature; NCEE, 2022).
At the teacher level, Singapore has chosen to make teaching an elite profession; only those who have passed rigorous selection criteria enter the profession, and all new teachers are trained at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University, the only national organization responsible for teacher preparation, leadership training, and educational research.Studies suggest an average of 2,000 teachers per year are enrolled in NIE's teacher preparation programs, with fee waivers and monthly stipends during the preparation period, reflecting the state's view of education as an investment rather than a burden (Lim, 2014; Gopinathan, 2023).
This policy makes teachers in Singapore part of a clear career path; promotion is not just from the classroom to administration, but there are career development paths such as Master Teacher, Research Teacher, or Educational Leader within the school, with ample opportunities for continuous development and advanced courses.This status translates into relatively competitive salaries and high social status, which enhances the attractiveness of the profession and creates a virtuous circle: top talent selection, high-quality training, long-term teacher retention, and continuous improvement in teaching quality (NIE, 2023; NCEE, 2022).
Official policy and educational discourse encourage a "culture of trial and error" in the classroom, where mistakes are not a source of stigmatization or ridicule, but rather an opportunity for learning and dialogue.This approach is necessary if the system is to move from a "school of grades" to a "school of skills," because innovation cannot grow in a climate where students fear failure or deviation from the "standard answer." Hence the importance of incorporating investigative activities, group presentations, open discussions, and special care for students who face difficulties, so that the exam does not become the only language spoken by the system (Kwek, 2023; OECD, 2023).
The shifts in curriculum and classroom culture, coupled with raising the status of the teacher, have allowed Singapore to maintain the rigor of the standards - as reflected in the PISA results - while allowing for the production of "innovative outputs" capable of working in a knowledge economy, rather than simply producing "excellent test takers" (Kwek, 2013; OECD, 2013).
Theme 3: Reducing stress and achieving school-life balance
Despite Singapore's quantitative success, there is an official recognition that the system in its old form generated high levels of stress and anxiety associated with exams and social comparison. An important part of the recent reforms therefore came to address the following question: How do we make school more rigorous in terms of educational quality...and less stressful?
The Ministry of Education has taken a series of measures that are both symbolic and practical. Most notably, it has eliminated the ranking of students and schools in official results and stopped announcing the "best of the best" in ways that encourage a cruel race for excellence. The official discourse has clearly stated that "learning is not a competition" and that focusing on grades alone reduces a student's value to a single number.As noted above, exams have been eliminated in primary one and two, and midterms have been scaled back in other grades, a clear message that the early years should build a healthy relationship with learning, not instill a fear of failure from childhood (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2018; IfOnlySingaporeans, 2018).
In parallel, the government has reframed the philosophy of academic success in its public discourse from "exam success" to "education for life"; that is, viewing grades as one indicator within a broader set of socio-emotional skills, values, resilience, and community engagement.This was reflected in the integration of psychological well-being and Social and Emotional Learning programs into the curriculum, and the promotion of extracurricular activities such as sports, arts, and volunteering as essential components of the "student profile" and not just secondary activities that can be ignored.
Schools have also expanded the provision of psychological support and counseling services, through social workers and educational counselors, and preventive programs aimed at building psychological resilience and the ability to deal with stress and anxiety. This has been accompanied by awareness campaigns for parents, encouraging them to avoid pushing their children into an endless race of private lessons and unrealistic expectations, and inviting them to adopt a more holistic view of their children's success, so that the self-worth of a child or teenager is not measured by grades alone (Kwek, 2023; OECD, 2023).
However, press reports and anecdotal evidence suggest that the pressure has not completely disappeared from the lives of Singaporean students; competition for seats in prestigious schools and universities is still intense, and the social culture still places a high value on academic achievement.The key difference is that the state no longer feeds this pressure through assessment and ranking policies, but rather attempts to reorient the culture toward a broader, more humanistic understanding of success. This is the essence of the Singaporean recipe: a school that is more rigorous in its standards of "quality learning" and "skill output" and less concerned with ranking people on a narrow scale of grades and exams.
Conclusion
Singapore's educational experience reveals that combining rigor and compassion in schools is not an impossible contradiction, but a conscious political-educational choice.By re-engineering the system towards "continuous assessment" instead of a single exam, liquidating the track system in favor of a flexible classification by subject, designing curricula that focus on deep concepts rather than fillers, elevating the status of the teacher to become the center of a skill factory rather than a textbook implementer, and redefining academic success as a life path rather than an exam race, Singapore was able to move from a model of "mindless memorization" to "mindless learning"."mindless memorization" to "rigorous and deep learning" without losing ground in international indices.The figures achieved by its students in PISA 2022, in a global context of decline, confirm that this path can combine both high performance and human-centeredness (OECD, 2023; Schleicher, 2023).
However, transferring this "miracle" to other contexts is not a process of mechanical copying of policies, but requires structural and cultural conditions, primarily a state that views education as a long-term national project, an ability to regulate the relationship between school, market and home, and a societal willingness to redefine the meaning of success. Singapore's lesson is not in the details of the evaluation system or the number of exams, but in the comprehensive vision that sees school as a space to create a citizen capable of lifelong learning in a world changing too fast for exam papers to count.
Comments